On 6/16/09 1:51 PM, "Mark Polesky" <markpole...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Trevor, could you add a bit to your recent LM 4.3.1 patch about
> empty-stencil and point-stencil? They are suitable substitutes for
> #'stencil = ##f.
>
> \override <grob> #'stencil = #empty-stencil
> \override <grob> #'stencil = #point-stencil
>
> See
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00332.html
> for a very recent discussion. I actually don't fully understand
> the subtleties of discerning when one is more appropriate than
> the other, but it sounds like you might!
I don't understand why empty-stencil has a non-zero extent; that means it
takes up space.
I believe that point-stencil should be used to replace ##f, because we want
to take up no space, and point-stencil has zero extent.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
