On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > Err, did you send this privately deliberately? > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:15:36PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Graham >> Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> > That's true. However, I chose to avoid having bugfixes on the >> > stable release. It's a simple question of resource allocation -- >> > how can we make best use out of the limited resources? >> >> This is completely backwards: the definition of a stable release (or >> rather: stable branch), is that it is bugfix only. > > Well, we have a month or two of bugfixes only.
Right - I am not saying that there must be a lot of work going on in the stable branch, it's just that it is not intended to be stagnant. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
