It's not a problem for me. As you can see, I always try to catch up with
LilyPond. That's why LilyPondTool is only released along with stable
LilyPond versions.
I'm only trying to help measuring the weight of a change: it's not just
a matter of changing convert-ly.
Bert
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 5/22/09 7:25 AM, "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)"
<lilypondt...@organum.hu> wrote:
By the way, who's offering to spend the 5-20 hours required to
implement such changes to the parser? (whatever we end up
deciding)
And also in the LilyPondTool parser? ;)
Bert,
As mucn as I like LilyPondTool, it seems to me that we can't refuse to make
changes to LilyPond just because it would require changes to LilyPondTool.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
