2009/5/1 Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com>: > It's a judgment call, but I think you would be the best candidate for > fixing it, since you have recently looked at this code.
Hehe. :) The less diplomatic answer: You should fix it because your patch broke ly:error. You could of course use an extra scm_is_pair to check whether REST is null, but I think it would be better to remove the extra code completely and instead extract each argument from the markup error message. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel