2009/5/1 Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com>:

> It's a judgment call, but I think you would be the best candidate for
> fixing it, since you have recently looked at this code.

Hehe. :)

The less diplomatic answer:

You should fix it because your patch broke ly:error.

You could of course use an extra scm_is_pair to check whether REST is
null, but I think it would be better to remove the extra code
completely and instead extract each argument from the markup error
message.

Regards,
Neil


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to