Hi Valentin,
Valentin Villenave a écrit :
Josh is right, this sentence doesn't really make sense. We recently
had a discussion about this very subject with John, who 's in the same
situation as you are, and is merely forced to contribute to
proprietary music software :-)
If I'd like to develop some musical applications of the math topics
(homometry, phase retrieval) I'm studying
and researching, it will be for one piece of software that their authors
would like to distribute under LGPL
but that the IRCAM direction and Forum (that's responsible for
distributing IRCAM software) want to
distribute with a proprietary license, which in the case of OpenMusic is
made very easy just by choosing
proprietary Lisp compilers. No working binaries from LGPL sources have
been made available
(because it's a pain to get it working on one particular GNU/Linux
operating system), so in the current
state all my contributions will be distributed as proprietary software;
to make my soul more quiet, I'd like
to make it working again on GNU/Linux, but I'm not sure I'm able to do
it within the 3 months left to me at
the IRCAM.
Cheers,
John
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
