On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-l...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> CPP='x86_64-linux-gcc -E -x c-header' >> /home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 >> --library-path >> /home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/math:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/elf:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/dlfcn:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/nss:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/nis:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/rt:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/resolv:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/crypt:/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/linuxthreads >> /home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/sunrpc/rpcgen >> -Y ../scripts -c rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o >> /home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T >> make[4]: *** >> [/home/lilydev/git/newgub/target/linux-64/build/glibc-core-2.3/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.stmp] >> Floating point exception > > Ugh. Is this reproducible? What if you run the command manually? Make sure > to set > the path, ie, run I am seeing this too, and it is reproducible. Since it is an FP during the install stage, I would suspect some kind of low-level mismatch somewhere. Interestingly, if I run [lily...@haring glibc-core-2.3]$ pwd /home/lilydev/vc/gub3/target/linux-x86/build/glibc-core-2.3 [lily...@haring glibc-core-2.3]$ ls ls: libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ls) ls: libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /lib/libselinux.so.1) ls: libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by /lib/libselinux.so.1) ls: libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /lib/libcap.so.2) ls: libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by /lib/libcap.so.2) ls: libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /lib/libacl.so.1) ls: libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /lib/libattr.so.1) perhaps there is some library version mismatch going on somewhere? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
