Graham
During GDP we experimented with various headings for
the levels below @subsection and I thought we had
standardised on @unnumberedsubsubsec with @node and
a menu entry. At least this is used in pitches, which
I thought was the gold standard for formatting.
Much of the LM was written before this policy was instated,
so other forms tend to be used there, like @subsubheading
and others which just use a @bo...@italic{..} one line
paragraph, and as the LM hasn't yet been revised these
non-standard formats are still there.
The specific problem with the examples quoted in LM 3.3.4
is that they use @unnumberedsubsubsec without an accompanying
@menu entry and @node, so they are formatted differently
in the ToC. I'll fix this, but we really need to lay down
clear standards for revisions under GOP. I suggest the
following - they look fine in both html and pdf but I can't
check info:
@node Level 1
@chapter Level 1
@menu
* Level 2::
@end menu
@node Level 2
@section Level 2
@menu
* Level 3::
@end menu
@node Level 3
@subsection Level 3
Most of the text goes here
@menu
* Level 4
@end menu
@node Level 4
@unnumberedsubsubsec Level 4
Long subsubsecs go here, so they appear in the Toc
Each has a separate html page
or @subsubheading Level 4 [no menu entry]
Short subsubsecs go here, don't appear in the ToC
Grouped in one html page
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>
Cc: "Reinhold Kainhofer" <reinh...@kainhofer.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: Learning Manual TOC missing subsubsubsections
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:45:38AM -0000, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 12:31 AM
I see sub^3 in LM 3.3.4. Those are the only ones, though.
Are you sure? I can't find any in fundamental.itely.
Line 2011. Yes, they're @unnumberedsubsubsec rather than
@subsubsec, but they still stick out in the LM.
Oh wait; those are sub^2, not sub^3. Still, they're the only two
sub^2 in the entire LM, so IMO they should be changed.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
