Werner, Patrick
Originally I opposed the @funindex foo form as being both redundant and
misleading,
but was out-voted (3 to 1). But on thinking about it again I have changed
my mind, for
the following reason.
The description of the contents of the Function index states that it "lists
all the LilyPond
commands and keywords". \foo is a command and foo is a keyword, so I am now
of
the view that both should appear in the function index.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Werner LEMBERG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: correct usage of @funindex and friends
Hi Werner,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in the manual I often see both [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo' and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\foo'.
IMHO, one of those forms is redundant. Which one? I'll walk over all
such index entries and fix it accordingly, but I ask you to decide
which form is the right one.
I think the [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo' form is redundant, since the actual
function/command names always begin with a backslash. However, I
think it would be acceptable to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo' as well as the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \foo'.
-Patrick
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
