2008/10/25 Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On 10/25/08 5:23 PM, "Trevor Bača" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > >> Trevor, you wrote Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:26 PM > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Maybe a quick mention of c[ ] in the manual could alert other > modern(ist) > >>> composers of the availability of the feature? > >> > >> Happy to do so. Could you please provide a minimal snippet to show > >> how this might be used in practice? The examples you attached are > >> too complex to illustrate the point, and the simplistic examples I've > tried > >> don't look good. > > > > OK, great! > > > > Maybe something like this? > > > > Are there any uses of [] without using \set? If you always use \set when > you use [] it will go in the snippets, instead of the main body of the > manual.
Check the final example in that suggested block. If you want a 'lone' note with flat flags on both sides, then you use [ ] without \set. -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
