On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 22:26 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Perhaps we could add a default for minimum-X-extent in > > define-grobs.scm. [...] > > Sounds like a good idea. Joe seems to be on vacation, though...
I just moved to a different continent to start a Ph.D, so I've been a bit preoccupied. Don't add minimum-X-extent to define-grobs.scm: the code in align-interface.cc is subtle because of the pure-height calculations (grobs can't suicide during pure-height calculations, so we need them to remain empty, even if they have minimum-Y-extent; I'll have to cook up a regression test that makes this obvious). I'll do a patch this weekend or early next week if someone else doesn't get there first. By the way, the whole problem would be avoided if it weren't for the hacky treatment of minimum-Y-extent (we no longer space systems using extents, but minimum-Y-extent gets special treatment for backwards compatibility). But I think that's a problem for 2.13... Joe _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
