Op woensdag 2 juli 2008, schreef Han-Wen Nienhuys: > I know what a decorator is - I'm sorry for thinking it didn't work, > but the code is a bit obtuse, and I got confused by > > return lambda f: conversions.append ((version, f, message)) > > which stores the conv function, but then will also redefine the conv > function to None. Essentially it does > > def dec(f): > return None > > @dec > def f(x): > return 1 > > print f > > => > > None
Yes, the function is not returned by the decorator because it needs not to be stored in 'conv'; it would be overwritten anyway by the next rule. (In the current situation the value of conv also changes after every function redefinition). > Can you document this more clearly so it does not look so strange? Ok. Does everybody like the syntax of a rule like this? > Also the patch should look like a proper commit, with description > prepended and your name attached as author. I don't know exactly how to do that, but I'll try to find out :) cheers, Wilbert Berendsen -- LilyKDE, LilyPond for KDE: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
