On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:48:45 +0100 "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/1 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It wasn't me; I just reminded somebody to work on it. > > > > If this uses 2.11 stuff (which I imagine it does, given the new > > dynamic stuff), then you should update > > input/new/piano-template-...ly > > Trevor, if you want the changes to stick, you'll have to edit the > example in input/new, Oops, I missed that. Good catch! Everybody, pay attention to the warning at the top of every input/lsr/ file: anything you modify *will* be lost! > though I question whether this is a good idea, > since it represents a deviation in behaviour from the other piano > templates. Well, we could either add it to all of them, or create an extra snippet showing this thing. Or maybe add it as a comment? > With regard to the dynamics issue, it's only a problem if you're > forcing fixed distance; it might be a case of mentioning this in the > NR piano section. Good idea. Andrew, what's your take on this? (err, you may want to look at the discussion in the mailist archives) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
