On Sun, 25 May 2008 10:35:35 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 25, 2008 9:50 AM
> > Sure, we would *rather* that people use GUB, but unless we want
> > inaccurate info in the LM, we need to deal with package managers
> > for every OS. IMO, it makes sense to lump them all together.
>
> I still like a two-level structure, but now we
> have to reverse the order:
Why? AFAIK most people use GUB, so why not list that first?
> <Expanation of difference>, then
> @strong{LilyPond installed from your OS distribution}
I wouldn't call it "OS distribution"; fink and cygwin aren't built
into the OS. I'd just say "package manager".
Anyway, at this point we're just nitpicking; the exact terms and
order doesn't really matter. You know the issue now, so go ahead
and do whatever you think is best in tweaks.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
