On Fri, 23 May 2008 09:40:21 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/23 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> or even textual annotation which
> >> can be applied to a note with either '-' or '\markup?
> >
> > In current GDP terminology, these are "Text scripts".
>
> Which is not necessarily sensible, since TextScript is already a grob.
...
Yes, it's the grob that is created when you write
c4-"foo" or c4-\markup{foo}
That's the whole *point* of calling them "text scripts". Unless I
really /am/ going senile in my old age...
> > Fundamentally, all text is produced via \markup. However, there
> > is a shortcut for defining simple pieces of text: you can write
> > "foo bar". Internally, this expands to
> > \markup{ \line { foo bar }}.
>
> Then perhaps we could name "foo bar" a "quoted text line"? (I like
> "line" much better than "string", and it conveys the same idea).
If we're going with "quoted text", why add a line? What do this
mean:
c4-"foo bar" c4-"baz bob"
Neither of those is a "line".
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
