2008/4/30 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Note that these settings don't behave like most others. > As is illustrated in the following example, the property > setting is only used for the first following dynamic > indication and is then automatically reset again.
I wasn't aware of that; looks like a non-LilyPond-ish behavior to me... > With the current semantics, this means that it doesn't > make sense to have \xxxOn and \xxxOff macros. Indeed. > I'm not sure if this is the intended and desired behaviour, > so perhaps it's better to first change the implementation > and then the naming. I'd rather change the implementation indeed, but wouldn't it mean potential compatibility issues? Can convert-ly handle such a change? Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
