2008/4/24 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, but that way the author's name won't be displayed at all (even > > the comment will be stripped out). > > Umm, yes. That is exactly the point.
In this case, why on earth would you like the authors to sign their snippets *at all*? > We have a THANKS file for a reason -- adding attributions to every > single contribution is unweildly. If this is a matter of THANKS, then we should just use the LSR user accounts to have a list of contributors. > > I don't have any solution, but it's a pity that we always have to > > print either the *whole* code verbatim or no code at all. > > Not a pity at all. We /want/ to show the whole file. I get your point, but aren't there some examples in the documentation where we have to add not-directly-relevant commands to make the examples clearer? e;g. adding some breaks, some alignment rules or whatever? Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
