Hi Graham, hi Mats, sorry for not having answered for a few days, I have been pretty busy learning how to use NSIS -- besides I haven't slept nor eaten for the last three days, so I guess a short holiday will be appreciated now :)
So, about the scheme/tuplets thing: 2007/12/12, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A few general comments: > - the LM is changing, so Scheme may or may not be introduced in > it. It's an interesting question. I have mixed feelings here, so i'm looking forward to see what will be decided. > - if possible, don't change existing stuff, since that means that > I have to figure out if the change is good or not. I'd much > rather simply see new examples. Comments like > @c this example is not obsolete > are much preferable than deleting the example. ??? AFAIK I didn't delete any example in the patch I sent you; my whole point was precisely to *add* explanations and examples. > Could you try making a second patch? Frankly, this was just a wild shot. I much prefer to wait for a few months; plus I'm convinced that the GDP helpers will probably have better ideas. For now, I'll just focus on the LSR again (John had talked about localizing it; I'll write him to see if he's still willing to do it). > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:04:48 +0100 > Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hope you realize that the first attempt to introduce music > > functions in the manual > > are not in this chapter, but in "Advanced tweaks with Scheme" in the > > LM. Oh yes; sorry for not having noticed it. By the way, what's the final call for renaming \times into \tuplet? (if any) Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
