2007/12/18, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I haven't looked closely at the patch, but judging from the description, > > > it does exactly what I had planned to do in determine-split-list. Does > > > anyone know why these patches never got applied? Are there any problems > > > with them? Or was there simply not enough interest? > > > > IIRC the patch was supposed to fix a few small things, but was quite > > huge. Requests for clarifications never materialized. > > Well, "small things"... It appeared to have fixed *the* problem that I have > with the partcombiner, namely that even one single note (where the other > instrument has a rest) is detected as a solo...
Yes, I understand that it's large from your perspective. However, it would mean that we would go from a file that very few understand to a file that noone understands. From a maintenance perspective, that is not a good idea. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
