On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:23:00 Nicolas Sceaux wrote: > Le 9 déc. 07 à 12:13, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit : > > Le 9 déc. 07 à 11:58, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit : > >> Le 8 déc. 07 à 23:41, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit : > >>> I'm trying to use \table-of-contents in a large mass (a full score > >>> with 17 > >>> instruments/voices and 7 pieces). Now, I have several problems: > >>> > >>> -) All items added with \tocItem appear in the same line (i.e. > >>> printed one > >>> above the other) > >> > >> There's a regression indeed. It seems that it was OK in 2.11.35, > >> but not > >> anymore in 2.11.36. > > > > The culprit is > > > > <http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=a0c6b9 > >7af8366c381263772aea1dfe1434a36c2c > > Joe, may I restore the previous definition on the function? > Do you remember the rationale for this change?
I remember the rationale, but it's too late right now for me to find a proper fix. The problem is with spacing single-staff systems. Suppose you have two systems, the first has staff-extent '(-2.0 . -2.0) and the second has staff-extent '(-5.0 . -5.0). Then the original function would put too much space between the lines because of the inner "(max 0 ...)". Also, there is a problem in that line-minimum-distance uses the extents while line-ideal-distance uses the staff-extents, but these aren't directly comparable. You're welcome to revert it; that will only cause some uneven spacing in a few situations and I'll have another look at fixing it later. Or if you want to figure out the correct solution, you're welcome to do that too :) It shouldn't need any special casing, it's just a matter of getting the arithmetic right. Joe _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
