Le jeudi 06 décembre 2007 à 14:57 +0100, Valentin Villenave a écrit : > 2007/12/6, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > AFAIK, most of the @commonprop aren't translated anyway, so this isn't > > really a regression. > > ??? I don't understand. In the former User Manual, we used to > translate everything we could, didn't we?
Yes, we did. If we go this way moving many stuff to LSR (which I fully agree), we *must* i18n LSR. I volunteer to help with this during my Christmas vacation, if Sebastiano accepts to make this big change to LSR. I guess this is not trivial work, so it might take a couple of weeks to achieve this. Sebastiano, what do you think? > > Why? The only tags that you might (usefully) use in snippet > > descriptions are <emph> and <code>. Those are *already* automatically > > translated into texinfo. > > That's not the only useful tags, as you know. I'm afraid we'd require > this feature to get really consistent formatting between the NR and > the integrated snippets. I'd like, at least, to know how difficult > this would be to implement (if there's a chance that it could easily > be done, we should take IMO). If we can handle this by simple text substitution -- I expect we can -- let's do it! Cheers, John _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
