Eyolf Østrem wrote:
I'm working on the articulations for the GDP, and I've ran into some
things that I would need assistance on:
In the absence of other replies, here's my best guesses.
1. Automatic placement. I think there should be a brief note about
what the rules are for how they are placed by default. Opposite of the
stem? How about polyphony? According to the voice number?
I think the best answer is to experiment -- make up examples with and
without polyphony (or perhaps simply altering \voiceOne to \voiceTwo or
no command at all), give it a bunch of articulations, and see what happens.
...
Actually, this could be a candidate for LM 3 Fundamental concepts, since
it affects -\markup{} as well.
...
It's still worth investigating this and writing up some text. The
text+examples might end up in LM instead of notation reference, but for
now add it to Expressive marks.
2. I've tried to work with different values for crescendoSpanner, but
there is no difference between line and dashed-line -- they both
produce a dashed line. Here's the example from the manual (ran with v.
2.11.34):
\set crescendoText = \markup { \italic "cresc. poco" }
\set crescendoSpanner = #'line
a'2\< a a a a a a a\!\mf
My first thought was that this could be an old format, but running it
through convert-ly (guessing at version 2.10.0) didn't improve it.
Mats? I haven't looked at this in detail; is this a bug or changed syntax?
3. similar problem with \override Hairpin #'after-line-breaking = ##t
It should, as I've understood it, let the hairpin continue to the
first note on the following line, but that doesn't happen here.
Create a minimal example and file a bug report? We're certain to find
bugs while we work on this. :(
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
