looks correct to me. 2007/10/1, Maximilian Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > long ago I promised to add some info to mf/README about how stem > attachments work for lilypond glyphs. Here finally is a patch. Since the > conclusions I drew were derived by trial and error, I may have > misinterpreted or overlooked something. Thus I'd be grateful if one of > the metafont experts could give it a quick review. Also, please feel > free to modify the wording as you like - I keep realizing that in > English I find it difficult to write clearly and concisely at the same. > > Thanks, > Max > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > > >
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
