2007/9/26, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am just curious: Why not introducing a new class "Octaveless_pitch" > or "Octave_Pitch" (i.e. pitch within an octave) that contains all of > "Pitch" except for the octaves, and then making "Pitch" a subclass of > "Octaveless_pitch" that just adds the octaves to its superclass?
There would only be one scheme type, the one for the base class, so this will require some extra typechecking for the Scheme interfaces -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
