2007/9/11, Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Possibly... but an *automated* page -- containing a listing exactly as
> > Trevor outlined BUT WITH ONLY THE DEFAULT SETTING/VALUE -- would keep up
> > *precisely* with development, since it would be scripted into the main
> > compilation process.
>
> Yep listing default values is easy - I agree - this was not what I was
This is actually pretty hard. Lots of defaults are supplied as arguments in
robust_scm2xxx(grob->get_property("yyy"), DEFAULT)
and there is no mechanism that enforces a uniform default across the
c++ code base.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
