Valentin Villenave writes: > This issue have been discused with Graham and Trevor recently: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-08/msg00179.html
Ok. There it says if there is any regtests which is useful as documentation and there is no corresponding snippet in LSR Although I agree that would be nice, currently that statement is ridiculous. It is way too early for that? We have about 600 regression tests, and there are only about 220 lsr snippets. I agree that newbies should not look at the regression test, but if you shut out power-users from the regression test, they'll miss about 400 features? We will have all sorts of questions: Can lily do this? > How about, for example, http://lilypond.org/web/devel/ That page could serve as a frontend to different versions, just like http://lilypond.org/web/documentation The regression tests are (as the name implies) hard linked to a specific lilypond version. They are built as part of the documentation (or `make web') build, so there should still be an index page in the documentation, besides Documentation/index.html.in, say Documentation/devel.html.in? It's also is an amazing advertisement for lily's features? How is a user supposed to report a bug or do a feature request without having access to the regression tests? Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
