Maximilian Albert escreveu: > Orm Finnendahl schrieb: > >> thanks for pointing that out. That's exactly along the lines I was >> thinking. Is anybody capable of doing the scheme/lilypond code? I >> don't know Metafont yet but I think I could handle that part and throw >> in the glyphs (they are currently PS Type1). > > Well, I'd be delighted to give it a try because this sounds exactly like > the kind of rather easy task which merely distracts the core team from > doing more difficult and really important stuff but gives newcomers like > me a chance to play around a little with the code and possibly even make > a useful contribution.
Exactly. > . So it seems that the use of "Accidental #'style" is deprecated and one > should set the alteration-alist directly. (But changing the style > property still works in v2.11.13, even if I don't know why, given that I > couldn't find the code handling it). What is the reason for this? To me > the former notation seems much more intuitive and easy to use. The recent microtone improvements needed a much more flexible way to map pitches onto symbols, and it seems superfluous to have two mechanisms for setting glyphname at the same time. It would be possible to have a mechanism to set the alist based on the style property, but I thought it would be overkill. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
