On 1/26/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Neeman escreveu: > > I have all the page-breaking files with coverage around 90% now, but > I'll try to improve it a bit more (btw, the reason > page-turn-page-breaking.cc was so low is that I forgot to put a \book > around the regression tests so the lilypond-book output skipped the > page-breaking stuff. Oops). > We have Scheme coverage now as well. This shows that layout-page-layout.scm.cov (define (walk-paths done-lines best-paths current-lines last current-best isn't covered. Can you also add a test that runs this old code? Or should we scrap it?
How about if we keep it for one more stable release? I can add a short test.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
