> >>> Regarding head-separation I wonder whether the current approach > >>> of lilypond to handle headers and footers is the right one. > >>> Wouldn't it be better to define a zone of a given height within > >>> the header (or footer) is rendered, instead of defining a > >>> distance from the header to the score? > >> > >>> Currently, if a header line is missing, the whole text jumps up. > >> > >> Perhaps we can take the maximum of both distances, > > > > Which distances? > > We could have a header separation measuring distance from the > header,
distance B > and another separation from the top of the page. distance A > The effective distance would be the lowest of both. Isn't this the same what I propose? ------------ ------------ ^ header ^ ^ no header | ------------ | | ------------ A| ^ A| B| | B| | | v v v v ------------ ------------ BTW, the change to `first-line-position' is a quite severe modification to the layout of the first page. Shouldn't this be mentioned somewhere? I can imagine that we add a CHANGES file which reports `minor' user-visible changes (but all of them which are not mentioned in the NEWS file). Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel