Alle 01:51, giovedì 27 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: > I hope you get the point: friendly and positive mail-tone is > essential for a mail-list cooperation. Do not assume that I > do not want to understand your point. And excuse me if I am wrong, > after all I (or others) could be helped to understand what you mean. > Also excuse me if this is not the best way to help reaching a > friendly atmosphere on this mail-list; I am trying as hard > as I can but I may fail.
I see, and totally agree. It's not easy to manage many emails with real-bugs reports or false-bugs. But an answer like "read the manual" is neither a friendly answer nor an answer at all. I prepared a score with lilypond and the celloist missed one note because of this problem, so I thought it could be a good idea to discuss this behaviour on the list. This is the reason my i went into a grumpy mood when you answered "try to live with it", because it would end the discussion with no solution, or no real conclusion. > I think your example on how weird accidental rules seem in > some places is very good. Accidentals may seem odd even if it is the > correct way these accidentals are placed. > > I do not think that the developers should change > the accidental-rules. I don't understand what you mean, you say accidental rules seem weird in some places, but should remain as they are. Why? -The only rule to be adjusted is "don't let the over-the-bar rule turn off the implicit "!" obtained by alternations in the same bar" -And to make it still better: "forget the alteration after n bars" _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
