On 7/6/06, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Mark Van den Borre wrote:
> Graham,
>
> "General improvements to "working on lilypond files", focusing on
> teaching users how to write files that are easier to update. Not that
> it will do any good, since nobody reads the manual anyway."
>
> I was not aware that you underestimate the relevance of your work so
> much. It is a splendid piece of work and very important to the
> Lilypond user experience.
>
> ...
100% agreed! At least, I *do* read now and then in the manual, and it's
now _extremely_ better than, say, 2 or 3 years ago!
Yeah, IMHO, the architecture of (and the quality of writing in) the
manual is one of the real strengths of our project.
I'm just crossing over the 1-year point using lilypond and I still
read and reread the manual all the time; our docs are a key resource.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
