Erik Sandberg schreef:
On Monday 26 June 2006 16:49, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On 6/26/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erik Sandberg schreef:
I guess this is an academic music representation issue: Do you think
that there is a fundamental difference (non-syntactically) between
events with postfix syntax, and other events?
No, and that's why I oppose to adding 'post-event as a music class.
One easy solution for now would be to let identifier_init wrap events
in chords when needed. In a future solution, I think it would be
sensible to represent all post-events directly as stream events; that
would clean up cases such as NoteEvent, where one [stream]event can
contain a list of [post]events.
.. and here's a patch. May I apply?
How's the complete picture now? (reg test compiles etc.?) I had rather
not see that we discover another syntax body in a broomcloset.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
