Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: >> Not necessarily; the unclean workarounds are temporary and isolated, >> and will only last until we decide to drop backward compatibility. > > I don't see the point of temporary workarounds: either we solve a > problem completely or we don't. There's nothing as long-lasting as a > temporary workaround.
What backward compatibility do we want to retain, and for how long? If the end result is a cleanup, and all ugliness is inside #ifdef REMOVE_BY_2_9_0, that might be acceptible? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
