Erik Sandberg schreef:
hm.. this one is about tupletSpannerDuration. I can see two alternatives to
solve this:
* re-add time-keeping to tuplet-engraver to insert starts/stops correctly.
* make time-scaled iterator check for tupletSpannerDuration, and generate
something like
<<
{\tuplet-start \skip 4 \tuplet-stop \tuplet-start \skip 4 ... }
music
if the property is set. I think this is the cleanest way I can find, but there
are problems:
I don't understand. You're using Sequential iterator, so why don't you do
{ \tup-start
first-part-of-time-scaled-music
\tup-end
\tup-start
2nd-part-of-time-scaled-music
\tup-end
}
this will delegate grace notes to the sequential-iterator.
- grace notes: (in {c8 c c \grace c c c c}, the grace should be under the
second bracket). Can be worked around by adding \grace \skip 1*50 after each
No, skip 1*50 is inacceptable.
tuplet start, that works in practise until we have a better way of handling
grace notes in the iterators.
- nested tuplets together with tupletSpannerDuration will give strange
results, but nobody should do that anyways.
I'm not sure it worked previously either; let's not worry about it.
I'll go on implementing (2) if you don't have any better ideas.
- vertical spacing tweaks (already reported this earlier)
- alignment-vertical-spacing.ly
will look into
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
