What about NoOutput? The point of the DevNull context, as I understand it, is to create the music (so it can be used for lyricsto), but have no output, either in printing or MIDI. I think NoOutput is more descriptive than Trash or Garbage.
Carl Sorensen -----Original Message----- From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 4:13 AM To: Erik Sandberg Cc: lily-devel Subject: Re: New lyrics trick available in 2.9.6 Erik Sandberg schreef: > I don't like NullContext (because no other context has "Context" in > its name). Perhaps something like Trash, Waste, Scratch or Garbage > would make even more sense for a user? You throw music into the > context, and from a lyricsto user's point of view, the music is not > discarded until the typesetting starts. > Please keep discussion on the list. One problem I see is that Trash is not evidently a context. Then again, most users quite grasp what context is anyway, so I'm probably making up problems that don't exist. "Trash" or "Garbage" sounds quite like hte regular metaphor. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
