On 5/4/06, Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 3 May 2006, David Feuer wrote:
> If we're looking to measure small changes, area of union minus area of
> intersection, divided by the area of the union, would probably be
> good.
If a really nasty bug creeps in, which makes the new bounding box very
tiny, but keeps the location, this distance will be about 100%.
Hm hm... Dividing by the area of the union is bad. Maybe divide by
the area of the old ones?
David
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
