2006/4/16, John Hawkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> And BTW, Lily's PostScript code's main purpose is to produce something
> which Ghostscript turns into a PDF. So, the PostScript does not have to
> adher strictly to the specs, but to what Ghostscript understands.
Yikes, really!? That's good to know, I guess, but also kind of
disappointing. For some reason that I have not bothered to debug,
PDFs that LilyPond (2.6.3) generates for me have bizarre defects, like
all text turning into the letter "y," etc. As such, postscript is the
way to go. Not to mention that it's faster.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> which Ghostscript turns into a PDF. So, the PostScript does not have to
> adher strictly to the specs, but to what Ghostscript understands.
Yikes, really!? That's good to know, I guess, but also kind of
disappointing. For some reason that I have not bothered to debug,
PDFs that LilyPond (2.6.3) generates for me have bizarre defects, like
all text turning into the letter "y," etc. As such, postscript is the
way to go. Not to mention that it's faster.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel