On 4/4/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The choice for GUILE is mostly historical, and I'm all for switching to > Mz, but I fear that such a move involves a tremendous amount of work, > due to API differences. > > You're welcome to give an Mz port a try, if you think it's feasible.
Having now looked at a little more of the code, I don't think a PLT port would be feasible right now. If at a later date the functionality provided by C++ and Scheme are sufficiently separated, or most of the functionality of the C++ code gets shifted over to Scheme, it might become reasonable. David Feuer _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
