Joe Neeman wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 20:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Juergen Reuter wrote:
Maybe I am totally wrong, but this discussion reminds me of an issue
that I raised on Nov 18, last year; see the thread starting here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-11/msg00088.html
I am mentioning this thread just in case that you are looking for
interesting test examples.
This is really something different. To solve this, we should rather
introduce some convexity in the penalties, so one perfect plus two
extremes is much worse than three so-so lines.
In constrained-breaking, I use the square of the force rather than its
absolute value -- I made the change for precisely this reason.
Hmm, doesn't that introduce scaling/dimension problems? Or does
everything else also use square(force) as a dimension? It would be
better if we could figure out a scaling constant, and then introduce an
arbitrary convex function, which may be set separately. I would guess
that the scaling should depend on line-width and spacing-increment.
FWIW, I used x^{1.1} for a similar problem with cross-staff knee beaming.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
