Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lilypond installs a shared library in /usr/share, to wit:
[snip] > This is very bad mojo and a violation of the GNU coding standards, > which require that /usr/share is only for architecture independent > files. really? I thought that /usr/local/share was for architecture independent files: "The root of the directory tree for read-only architecture-independent data files. This should normally be /usr/local/share" [1] But I suppose that in this case /usr/lib/python<version>/site-packages/ should be the right choice? Pedro Kröger Footnotes: [1] http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Directory-Variables.html#Directory-Variables _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
