Citerar Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > No, C++ and Java are much the same: statically typed imperative
> prrogramming
> > languages, with support for object orientation. I think I would use a new
> > project to start learning Haskell or OCaml.
>
> I´d vote for Haskell.
>
> Having said that, I am quite comfortable with LilyPond as it is now. While
> there are quite a few language dependencies (C++, Scheme, Python,
> PostScript, TeX, and lex/yacc), I think that it runs quite well. Sure, one
> could try to do away with a few of them (for example, Python and TeX),
In what way is TeX a language dependency? All I can see, is that lilypond-book
needs to scan and manipulate .tex files (by looking for \include and
\begin{lilypond}), but that script is anyway just a bundled add-on program for
those who already use TeX.
Erik
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
