On Thursday 21 July 2005 20.24, Stephen wrote: > One more point, while the general recommendations still cite (I finally > figured out how to spell it) an assumption that the general user might > still only have a screen resolution of 800x600, it is a good assumption > that a user of a graphic oriented program like Lilypond is likely to have a > minimum screen resolution of 1024x768 nowadays. So a minimum width of 972 > would be acceptable.
I disagree. The fact that lily creates beautiful output, doesn't mean that its users have good graphics hardware. I'd say the opposite: You hardly need to watch the output for other than proofreading purposes. I'm sometimes using lily on 800x600 screens, so I'd be more happy if that would be considered OK. Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
