Strange, the -devel list should not strip attachments.
I originally didn't look closely. Now that I investigate, it looks like
it was the comcast.net mail server that blocked outgoing email with .bat
attachments saying "unsafe windows attachment - resend as TAR or GZ".
I'm not sure I understand, it seems that the test is for operating
system flavour, not for unicode functionality
Yes, that is right. I was thinking along the lines of minimizing the
amount of "extra" stuff that a user would need to install to use
lilypad. Since Win 9x/ME will probably go the way of the dinosaur in
the next couple of years, just wasn't sure it was worth the extra
complication. Maybe not a good decision... Sorry if I'm showing a
US-centric bias.
I thought that you said the unicode version of lilypad would work when
the user installs compatibitily libraries? Did I misunderstand?
Actually, you need to link the unicode version of lilypad against a
special library that then detects if the compatibility libraries are
necessary, and if so, if they're installed. My modifications for a
non-unicode version of lilypad didn't include how to link against said
library.
-Russ
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
