Laura Conrad wrote:
I agree. That's equivalent to what I was asking for. 2.4.2 is stable enough for me. I just don't want to go back to 2.2.6 if there is a problem with lilypond-snapshot.
JN> Pedro Kröger writes: >> I'll think about. but my inicial plan was to have both (i.e. lilypond >> and lilypond-snapshot) in debian.
JN> That would be great.
I agree. The current state where lilypond-snapshot is actually a
stable version should change, but being able to install both a stable
and an unstable version is really useful.
Paul
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
