[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've just tried lily 2.5.13 in fink. Lilypond itself works ok,
> although the fonts
> are quite heavy. Han-Wen mentioned that they might be displaying in
> bold?
>
> lilypond-book (I used the LaTeX example template from chapter 3 of the
> manual; see below) wasn't happy:
> 1) \usepackage{graphics} needs to be added to the generated .tex file.
yup.
> 2) latex didn't display any errors, but dvips did.
>
> ----
> spark:~/tmp gperciva$ dvips foo.dvi -o
> This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software
> (www.radicaleye.com)
> ' TeX output 2005.03.06:1428' -> foo.ps
> dvips: Font emmentaler-20 used in file lily-1263226555-1.eps is not in
> the mapping file.
> dvips: Font emmentaler-20 used in file lily-901382177-1.eps is not in
> the mapping file.
> <texc.pro><texps.pro><special.pro>. <cmr10.pfb>[1<lily-1263226555-1.eps>
> <lily-901382177-1.eps>]
> ----
>
> The resulting ps/pdf had staff lines, bar lines, and note stems; no
> noteheads,
> clef, etc.
>
you still need -u+lilypond.map
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
