Maybe I am wrong, since I am not sure what SCM_ASSERT_TYPE does, but I
think there is a tiny bug (see attached patch).
Greetings,
J�rgen
Index: lily/duration-scheme.cc
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/lilypond/lilypond/lily/duration-scheme.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 duration-scheme.cc
--- lily/duration-scheme.cc 31 Jan 2005 12:53:10 -0000 1.2
+++ lily/duration-scheme.cc 20 Feb 2005 23:04:39 -0000
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
bool compress = false;
if (num != SCM_UNDEFINED)
{
- SCM_ASSERT_TYPE (scm_is_number (num), length, SCM_ARG3, __FUNCTION__,
"integer");
+ SCM_ASSERT_TYPE (scm_is_number (num), num, SCM_ARG3, __FUNCTION__,
"integer");
compress = true;
}
else
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
if (den != SCM_UNDEFINED)
{
- SCM_ASSERT_TYPE (scm_is_number (den), length, SCM_ARG4, __FUNCTION__,
"integer");
+ SCM_ASSERT_TYPE (scm_is_number (den), den, SCM_ARG4, __FUNCTION__,
"integer");
compress = true;
}
else
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
