[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> seperating out things which are common between Grobs and Snobs into a > >> base object (Probs - property objects). The first major hurdle I have > >> hit is that of interfaces. I am having difficulty deciding whether > >> interfaces should be the domain of grobs only, whether there should be > >> a seperate set for snobs, or whether a single unified set should > >> suffice for both. Would you have any insights into this question? > > > > I'd refrain from trying to be too generic when it's not clear that you > > will need it. Don't put in interfaces, and once you really need them, > > let them bubble up from the Grob class. > > Sounds good. So for the meantime, I am running without interfaces. I > do have one more question. I am also running without Object_keys for > now, as I have not yet been able to determine for what purpose they > are used. Is there a good reason to include these?
No. We can hack them in if necessary. Object_keys is highly-experimental stuff for a yet-to-build graphical tweak editor. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
