[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >   * I suspect that you could import the input/{test,regression}/
> >     directory wholesale.
> 
> Well, I thought about that, but many regressions show that lily does the
> right thing when writing stuff normally, so they're not a good candidate
> for explaining how to do strange staff. Unless, however, we want to have
> a "regression" flag and we have a separate search engine for
> regressions, mainly for developer. I'd be glad to do that if you think
> it's useful.

Maybe this is not useful for the regtest, but it would be very
convenient for the bug collection. Then there would need to be some
kind of selection {NEW-BUG,VERIFIED,FIXED,TESTED,CLOSED} which can be
used for communication between the hackers and the Bug meister. 

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen 



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to