Hi!
Just wondering: wouldn't it me more consistent to rename "\line" into
"\row"? Then we have "\column" and "\row" as a complementary pair of
commands.
Since there is currently a "word-space" property for "\line", maybe there
should be an according property for "\row" for vertical spacing. If you
do not want to invent yet another property name, maybe one wants to call
this property "cell-space" or "padding" or similar for both, "\column" and
"\row".
Greetings,
Jürgen
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wouldn't mind of demanding that users write
> >
> > \line
> >
> > explicitly inside \column to go to horizontal mode again, ie.
> >
> > \markup { \column { a b \bold { c d } e f }
> >
> > =>
> >
> > \markup { \column { a b \bold c \bold d e f } }
> >
> > I think this is more consistent. Of course, \markup should implicitly
> > enclose its argument in \line.
>
> done.
>
> \markup { a { b c } \bold { d e } f }
>
> =>
>
> \markup { a b c \bold d \bold e f }
>
> Corollary:
>
> \markup \column { { a b } { c d } }
>
> =>
>
> \markup \column { a b c d }
>
> so one has to use \line to group markups on a line when using \column
> and friends:
>
> \markup \column { \line { first line } \line { second line } }
>
> nicolas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
