[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > will produce two chord labels (both D), and two FretDiagrams (which will > be different items from the hash table). I think this feature could be > convenient for those who may prefer to have multiple fret diagrams for a > chord in a piece. > > What do you think?
I think that a. we are storing chords in the wrong way. In retrospect, I find root + list of (step, alteration) tuples more logical b. using the octave to store different variants is misuse of that less-than-perfect storage model. I think that we should have some kind of ChordAlternativeEvent to store the extra information. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
