Alle 00:03, domenica 21 novembre 2004, hai scritto: > > It's generally easier to get started by implementing things in guile > (scheme), rather than starting off playing with the parser.
Actually, I am quite fresh on parsers (just developed a language), however, I sense you are right in the idea of "starting slow"; however, although I have some basic knowledge of scheme, I suppose I can only hack around copying&pasting other's code for a while, as I am rusty ATM with that language. Of course, as lilypond target are much more musichans than hard core hackers (ya know, that bunch of guys programming in lisp/scheme all day ;-) I suppose that as version number get higher, scheme slang will be progressively replaced with musichan friendly commands, am I right? If it's so, I agree making a scheme function to do that job. > > Hope this helps, Yes; I'll try as soon as I can (uhm, quite busy the next few days, including tomorrow, so it may be in a week or so). Tnx. Giancarlo Niccolai. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel